Thanks to the diligence of Andy Boddington, Shropshire Conservatives have been forced to scrap their election manifesto. Andy discovered yesterday that Shropshire Conservatives had misappropriated a photograph from an Australian mental health charity, and tried to pass it off as their own. The image is the principle image on the front of their manifesto, appearing in the masthead.
After Andy contacted the media, the Conservatives tried to laugh it off before the heat forced a climb-down. They agreed to apologise to the charity, to stop delivering the leaflets and to compensate the charity.
To blatantly steal the image is appalling. The fact it was stolen from a charity is an outrage. I hope the compensation they are paying to the charity is considerable. I also hope that for once they follow through on their promises, compensate them well and junk the leaflet as promised. Cynical me thinks they may try and duck out the compensation and still deliver the leaflet.
You have to wonder why they couldn’t rustle up half a dozen Conservatives for their leaflet lol
Last Saturday, 25th of March, LibDems joined hundreds of parents, children and concerned Shropshire residents to march against the threat to downgrade Shropshire’s Maternity Units. SaTH had previously produced a report as part of their budget which identified downgrading the units to Birthing Units, where expectant mothers would need to make an appointment to give birth at night.
Oswestry and Bridgnorth both had a march on Saturday. Ludlow had previously held a march to support their unit. Both were extremely well attended and the weather was glorious.
In Bridgnorth, they marched through the High Street to the Castle Grounds. Whilst in Oswestry they met in Cae Glas Park and paraded around the park. Both marches had a great turn out. Thank you to everybody who organised the marches and who attended to show their support.
The MLUs needs to stay open 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. Expectant mothers can’t be expected to deliver to order and to an appointment. Many sources have responded to campaigners that the MLUs aren’t going to be downgraded. Campaigners have remained cynical and kept up the pressure and the protest. The marches just being one element of that protest.
Late yesterday it emerged that SaTH were still going to go ahead with the downgrading the MLUs to a Birthing Units. The report for today’s board meeting shows that they aren’t going to be open at night, except for mothers already in labour. Anybody who going into labour will either have to go elsewhere in an ambulance or potentially deliver in a car. Delivery can’t be planned to that extent so this policy is bonkers. Campaigners are rightly angry that they won’t have the same access to postnatal care after the downgrade.
After my last Focus, the feedback I received via text, survey, email or on the doorstep had a consistent theme… traffic, speeding, parking and the high number of HGVs. Park Hall, Whittington, Babbinswood, Queens Head and West Felton having specific problems. Speeding has previously been highlighted as a problem in the Whittington Parish Plan. Similar issues over parking were identified in the West Felton Parish Plan. Namely, parking by the school and the shop, the need for double yellow lines and the use of the Punch Bowl car park to alleviate that.
Talking to residents on Station Road and Boot Street in Whittington, the HGVs are a particular concern. With many accidents and near misses as lorries pass through the town, with pedestrians nearly being blown off the pavements or nearly being hit by cars driving along the pavements trying to avoid a lorry.
Poorly located signage also came up as an issue in West Felton and Babbinswood. Another issue was speeding cars harassing motorists who were obeying the speed limit, including one instance of a driver gesticulating at a probationary driver.
So armed with a speed gun I went out to see for myself what the problems were.
I found speeding across the division. The most excessive speeds over the speed limit recorded are shown below, along with the 85th percentile speed and the average:
Babbinswood – 66mph in a 40mph speed limit. 85th percentile = 46mph Average = 40mph Queens Head – 52mph in a 30mph speed limit. 85th percentile = 39mph Average = 35mph West Felton – 44mph in a 30mph speed limit. 85th percentile = 36mph Average = 32mph Whittington – 42mph in a 30mph speed limit. 85th percentile = 36mph Average = 32mph
The differences are down to the geography and the conditions on the road. Both Boot Street and Holyhead Road have flashing reminder signs and some calming measures. Babbinswood doesn’t have anything. Queens Head has 30mph roundels marked on the road. However, these are in very poor condition and need refreshing.
When I was a County Councillor I was one of the members that sat on the task and finish group that reviewed village speed limits. One of the findings was that flashing reminder signs were particularly effective in reducing excessive speed. Over time the effect diminishes as drivers get used to seeing the signs. The most effective signs were moveable flashing signs as they reduced this drop-off. They also allow the signs to move around the villages and reduce the cost of using them significantly. The differences in the speeding Between Queens Head and West Felton clearly shows the benefit of flashing signs.
I recorded speeds using standard practice for a speed survey, measuring traffic in free flow conditions. The speed of a vehicle was only recorded for the first vehicle in a queue, for example, as the remainder of the queue isn’t driving in ‘free flow’ conditions. Speeds were measured by random sample for an hour at a time until sufficient observations were made. Some sites were revisited at another time of day. Figures generally recorded in either rush-hour weren’t included because they weren’t in ‘free flow’ conditions. They do have some use for me though in assessing the prevailing conditions.
My biggest conclusion is that I need to do this again. So I will be out again to gather more data. It is quite apparent from what I have seen and measured that speed in Babbinswood and Queens Head, in particular, can be tackled and be self-enforcing. The Police would insist on any scheme being self-enforcing as they don’t have the resources. Introducing moveable flashing signs, narrowing and other driver reminders and renewing roundels will improve matters considerably.
Existing signage can be improved by relocating some of the signs. The flashing sign on the north side of West Felton needs moving the other side of Dovaston Court as drivers are only slowing down after this junction. In Babbinswood on Berghill Lane, the National Speed Limit signs at the B5009 junction need moving away from the junction to the end of the houses on Berghill Lane. Residents have complained that this road is a rat run to/from Ellesmere Road. This simple move would stop the speeding past these houses.
The absence of ‘free flow’ conditions also has some implications for the amenity of residents. The council uses speed limits for safety but it is also has a responsibility for the safety of pedestrians and the amenity of residents. Schemes aren’t just about safety they are also about improving the area we live in.
Shropshire Council’s contractor, Ringway, taking 2 years to get double yellow lines implemented is far too long. 84 sites of concern were raised with Shropshire Council in 2015/16 but ONLY 10 were implemented. Only a maximum of 8 schemes will get funding this year. If the Conservatives are re-elected then projected reductions in the Highways budget threaten even this paltry effort.
If I get elected on May the 4th, I would aim to get more done to improve traffic calming and reduce excessive speed. More can and should be done than the Conservatives are managing.
This month I have been on two marches organised to defend local services from Conservatives cuts. Strangely, no Conservative MPs were present at the march. Conservative Councillors were in short supply too.
On the 11th I was on the march against £13.4m cuts to schools funding in Shropshire. I joined hundreds of parents, children teachers & concerned members of the public in a March against Conservative school cuts.
As a former Shropshire County Councillor who held an Education Portfolio in the Cabinet, I know how important good education is.
Having a good education is vital for our children’s future life choices. It is the foundation of our economy. We need a well-educated population to improve overall productivity, create wealth and jobs. In the new post-Brexit world this will be even more important!
Schools serving Whittington & West Felton are going to lose nearly £1m by 2020 and Shropshire faces losing £13.4m across the county. These figures have been estimated by the NUT.
Shropshire needs fair funding. I made this call a decade ago when I was a councillor. Other areas like ours have consistently received more money than Shropshire for a long time. Despite reviews claiming to bring fair funding Shropshire always misses out. With Conservatives controlling the Government and Shirehall, you would think they would work together and get this issue sorted out. If we got anything like the money Cornwall gets we wouldn’t see anything like the funding problems we do now.
Shropshire Conservatives cost schools extra – over £1m
The Conservative Government are also cutting over £500,000 from our schools. This is on top of the £13.4m. From April our schools are being forced to pay the Apprenticeship Levy. Shropshire Lib Dems asked the Tory Administration to lobby the government to exempt schools but they voted against it.
The Conservative government have scrapped the Educational Support Grant worth £1.2m – local Conservatives councillors voted down a budget amendment from the Lib Dems to scrap £643,000 of local cuts by using money from the Council’s large computing budget.
I am really angry that the Conservatives are clawing back, even more money from our local schools. Money is tight as it is. On top of all this, schools are also seeing rises in the farcical Business Rate changes coming next April. Whittington Primary school rates are going up 22% & West Felton Primary school rates are going up 15%. I imagine the business rate rises will get covered somewhere, so the schools don’t pay it directly, but somebody has to pay it. Schools should be zero rated.
This has developed into a national problem reported widely by the national media. Reports are that the Chancellor is now facing a backlash from Conservative MPs who have been feeling the heat from Business facing extortionate rises.
Andy’s figures make grim reading for Ludlow and the other Market Towns of Shropshire. Massive, punitive business rate rises are not just a story for urban areas in Shropshire. The pain is also being felt in rural areas too. If the Conservatives continue to get this wrong then more shops and business will close and cease trading. Cross Street’s empty shops are that way because of high rents and rates. Spending £50k on bollards or removing the bollards won’t help get those premises filled. Street Scene enhancement and realistic rents and rates would make a bigger difference. Let’s hope Cross Street isn’t the tip of an iceberg.
Whittington and West Felton businesses are also feeling the pinch as they face their new rates in April. In the SY11 4 postcode district, which is almost exactly the same as the County Division boundary for Whittington Division, the average business rate change for 195 businesses is a 38% rise. Some businesses can have a compound effect where they have a cash machine on the premises. Such businesses can get charged business rates for the main business plus a separate bill for the cash machine itself.
A few lowlights:
average business rate change for 195 businesses is a 38% rise
The biggest % rise is seen by Rednal Karting with a whopping 223% rise
Mile End filling station is going up by 71%
The Ironworks is going up by 58%
Holiday cottage businesses are going up by 113%
Brynallt Kennels facing a rise by 98%
Workshops are facing a rather modest rise of 33%
Shops face a rise of 209%
Hairdressing & Salons face a rise of 210%
Over the last few days, there have been reports about how the Government is going to make appealing harder. However, businesses have been telling me that they have huge issues with appealing already and that Shropshire Council isn’t very helpful and somewhat obstructive in the process. Shropshire Council is only the collection authority but surely they can be more sensitive and direct businesses to where and how they can appeal.
There was already huge disquiet with Business rates and the inherent fairness of the valuations. At Rednal Karting they would like a fairer assessment. When they compare themselves to other similar Karting venues they are severely penalised and have been frustrated in getting the valuation appealed.
If the Government does back down it would be welcome but if it is simply a tweak of the transitional arrangements that wouldn’t be a satisfactory outcome. The current suggested transitional arrangements are geared towards larger businesses. Business Rates need a comprehensive root and branch review to make sure that the system is fair to everybody, not just those at the top and the bottom.
In the post-Brexit world, we need to be doing more than ever to support the economy and help businesses make the transition thrive, not penalising businesses.
Many moons ago – 15 years ago to be exact – when I was a Councillor for Bridgnorth, I campaigned long and hard to get broadband to Bridgnorth. Eventually, Bridgnorth got onto the list for pre-registration in 2002. BT set a high a trigger-level of 750 before they would consider enabling broadband at the exchange. Again I campaigned to get people to register and get Bridgnorth over BT’s interest trigger level. This culminated in Bridgnorth passing the ADSL trigger-level in February 2003 and a lot earlier than other places. The Exchange was enabled the following May. As a County Councillor, I also worked to see the roll-out of Broad Places.
Back then I said: “Securing broadband will lead to a massive economic boost for Bridgnorth. Improving the access and the speed of communication for businesses and home users will create new opportunities for job creation.” Times have changed, but this still holds very true today. The fact we are still lagging behind other areas is not good.
Speeds around Whittington
Over the last decade, across all sectors of the economy, services have shifted online as broadband access became more widely available. Businesses have made efficiency savings and opened up their business to whole new markets. Public bodies followed suit. Now the expectation is that services are delivered online. It hasn’t all been good news, with increased social isolation and lower customer ‘face-time’ leading to remoteness and in some cases a drop in customer satisfaction.
Speeds around West Felton
Throughout this process, and of particular concern to me, is the rural bias BT operates by. Rural areas pay the same charges as our Urban counterparts, yet the service we receive is always far worse. As services switch to online, poor access to the internet is a real handicap for businesses and individuals in rural areas. The have-nots left in rural desserts or ‘not spots’ left unable to do the basics or having to put up with a reduced service. Shropshire Council has been paying BT to roll out Fibre Broadband into rural areas. Yet now we are in the realms of Super Fast Fibre Broadband. Currently, only 47% of exchanges in Shropshire can deliver Super Fast Broadband.
Having moved to Aston Moors, West Felton I was shocked at the broadband speed Sandra and Lily received: An abysmal 1.5mbps. After looking at the subsidies available through connecting Shropshire, we were told we didn’t qualify so we upgraded to Fibre to achieve the heady heights of 7.5mbps…. An incredibly slow speed for fibre and even for bog standard broadband. I have previously received 20mbps in Bridgnorth 5 years ago. At work, fibre came to the village of Upton Magna two years ago and we enjoy a speed of 75mbps at our offices.
Take a look at any rural area on the think broadband website and the disparity from area to area in Shropshire is huge. At a time when services are online, and Councils & service providers expect/require you to access their services that way… At a time when businesses need to be as competitive as possible, locally and internationally… At a time when public expectations for how services should be delivered… Such poor access is a real barrier to Shropshire economic success and runs the very real danger of leaving many vulnerable people in rural areas more isolated than ever.
Many areas are now getting Ultra Fast Broadband. If Shropshire’s economy is to properly compete with other counties in the UK, or globally, in the post-brexit world, we need faster access and 100% roll our of Super Fast Broadband, and we need it quickly.
A couple of weeks ago Shropshire Council launched their review into the Local Plan (known as SamDev) and have launched a consultation.
The review will identify how much housebuilding and employment development will take place in the County until 2036, and where it will go. It will also look at the boundaries of the Green Belt, which is protected from development. Sites to build 17,000 homes in the County by 2026 have already been identified, and it is proposed that the updated plan will identify further sites to enable an additional 11,000 to 13,000 homes will be built over the next 20 years.
Why is this important?
This is likely to be the only real opportunity residents and Parish Councils to comment and make representations on it. There will be very limited if any opportunity to comment on submissions made by developers. Due to lack of time and more significantly a lack of staff available to do the work. Once the plan is amended it will be very hard to alter sites or object to development on these sites.
Coupled with this consultation is the ‘Call for sites’ in addition to those adopted in the 2014 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). Whilst No sites were adopted in West Felton, or Whittington, several were earmarked in Whittington (appendix 4) with long-term potential or potential. These sites will be back in the mix no doubt in this consultation. But history has shown how this can change in an unplanned way.
SamDev has had a troubled history already
We have seen to our cost already how the Conservatives made a mess of SamDev. SamDev was delayed for 2 years leaving the Council with no 5-year land supply. This meant many sites were granted planning permission that wouldn’t if they had an adopted policy.
The SamDev delays were due to staff shortages caused by the Conservative policy of allowing anyone who asked for redundancy to take it. This short-sighted policy showed no strategic aim nor vision. Many planning and development control officers left. Much expertise and knowledge that was lost to the council.
As a result, West Felton will be burdened with 70-100 houses they didn’t want. If they had have been planned properly they would have probably been located differently, with a mix of houses more in line with the needs of the village and on a much smaller scale – The more likely outcome… Not at all.
As a Land Surveyor working for one of the countries most successful planning consultancies I find this particular failure by the Conservatives unacceptable and in one of the big drivers behind my decision to stand for lecetion next May.
Is the scope of the review going to be fit for purpose?
Probably not. Only yesterday the Conservative Government criticised Councils for being too slow and not accurately allocating enough housing to meet the national need. They will be shortening the planning process. Whilst good from a planning and development point of view, this is bad news for residents wishing to be involved in the planning process. It is now more important than ever that parish councils and residents get involved in policy development to head off poor policy making at the pass.
The latest available Road Traffic Accident data was released last October. The data for Whittington and West Felton Parishes broadly follows the trend shown in increasing traffic numbers across the country. However, the provisional data to June 2016 shows a potentially worrying spike. The last column on the right shows that the first half of 2016 had nearly eclipsed the annual total of the year before. If that trend continued through the rest of 2016 then 2016 would have had double the accidents of the year before and of the average since 2008.
The last column on the right shows that the first half of 2016 had nearly eclipsed the annual total in 2015 and matched the average of the years before (13 accidents.)
If that trend continued through the rest of 2016, then 2016 would have had double the accidents of the average since 2008. If there were no more accidents in the rest of 2016 then the figures would be on average. The later would be welcome but not a reason for complacency. Odds are that it is the former.
Residents have expressed concern about the A5 and the traffic growth for years. Some have called for the A5 to be converted to a dual carriageway and others have called for the addition of round-a-bouts at Queens Head and at Shotatton crossroads. The original design of this junction was questionable. It is clear to everybody who uses these junctions, on a daily basis, that the potential for serious problems is of growing concern. Far better to sort out these inadequate junctions before something serious happens. Over to you Highways England….
Crashmaps.co.uk is a useful site for seeing the location and details of reported road traffic accidents. The full 2016 figures will be made available by the department of transport next June
Last week Powys Council announced that they will be replacing their existing street lights with LED Street Lights. They will be spending £1.5 million to replace over 5,000 street lights. Staffordshire council is doing the same and Herefordshire completed their switch to LED last year. Yet sleepy Conservative-led Shropshire Council are… errmm… doing nothing!
Currently, Shropshire Council is trialling the use of LED street lights. (There is one of these LED Lights on Station Road in Whittington.) However, they are making a costly mistake by not rolling out the more economically efficient LED lights. At present, Shropshire Council considers that the capital cost of swapping their lights is too high and are hoping that the cost of the lights comes down.
“…a significant number of columns are presently posing an unacceptable risk and are in urgent need of replacement” Shropshire Council, Challenge Fund Bid 2015
In my view, this is a very poor decision. When you consider that 88% of the lights are made of decaying concrete or that 44% are over 25 years old and 14% are over 50!! Shropshire Council said in 2015 that data to May 2014 showed that a significant proportion of the 4,060 light tested presented an “unacceptable risk and are in urgent need of replacement.” They identified that 252 needed immediate replacement and an additional that 2,347 needed replacement by 2017/18. So 65% of those tested needed replacing presenting an “unacceptable risk and are in urgent need of replacement.”
They could use some of their £175 million cash reserves or they could borrow the capital cost from the Government’s Green Investment Bank, given that interest rates are still at historically low levels. Either way, replacement is increasingly inevitable anyway. It is economic madness to do nothing when the long-term on-going savings are huge and the obvious benefits to public safety are widely accepted.
In 2014 The Government invited all Highways Authorities in England, including Shropshire Council, to submit bids for a slice of the £275 million Challenge Fund. 28 authorities were successful in meeting the fund’s criteria and putting forward the strongest bids. Shropshire’s bid in 2015 was unsuccessful. Arguably because their bid lacked ambition. They only wanted to replace lights over 35 years old. Other similar bids were bidding to modernise the whole network. This failure left Shropshire with its old and inefficient street lighting. Fast forward 2 years and many many authorities are putting Shropshire to shame, investing to save considerable money on their energy bills.
Safer, Brighter, Cleaner and Cheaper
Just like domestic LED lights used in your home, there is an initial capital cost to replace the lights. However, the ongoing savings thanks to their longer life expectancy and replacement costs, and the direct savings in terms of power consumption. This means that the year on year savings quickly outway the initial capital cost. Using LED Streetlights also has the upside of improved lighting, reducing crime and improving safety for both pedestrians and road users alike. Due to the more directional lighting, they also reduce light pollution in the night sky and aren’t as much a nuisance to residential property. They also contribute to reduced Carbon Dioxide emissions, don’t use dangerous heavy metals or emit UV radiation.
Street lights in Shropshire use enough power to light every house in Whittington Parish
According to Shropshire Council, it takes 7.7 million kilowatt-hours of power to run their 18,500 street lights, illuminated signs and traffic signals every year – enough to power 2,600, or every home in Whittington Parish, for a year! Annually they spend £800,000 on repairing and renewing Street Lighting. The electricity consumed by an ‘average’ light costs between £25 and £65 a year. Both the capital replacement and maintenance cost and the energy costs could be radically cut by switching.
According to Shropshire’s challenge Fund bid, the annual energy saving would be about £300,000 a year. That is £300,000 that can be reinvested in services, reinvested in the Street Light network or to reduce council tax levels. Over the lifetime of the new lights (24 years) that saving would be about £7.2 million of energy savings. With rising energy prices that saving figure has to be considered a conservative estimate. Given that many of the new light would last beyond that lifetime, the savings could be considerably more. At a time when money is tight, these are precious savings that need to be made
Given the environmental benefits, the “unacceptable risk” of column failure and the significant ongoing savings, doing nothing is not acceptable.
Last week the National Union of Teachers announced the estimated cuts to every School Budget by 2020. Based on current Government policies, the total estimated reduction across all schools in Shropshire in real terms is:
This is a vast sum which amounts to a Shropshire average of £394 cut Per pupil or 360 Teachers axed. As a former County Councillor and Cabinet member with an Education portfolio, I find these numbers quite depressing and very short-sighted.
A good education is a critical factor in not only an individual’s personal life chances but also essential in terms of the nation’s ability to create wealth. By starving schools of the resources they need, standards will go down and ultimately we are all poorer. Especially in a post-Brexit world, we need to invest heavily in Education and supporting all of our industries to adjust to the new demands facing the economy. Get this wrong and the long-term problems for the economy will mount up. After Brexit, we need to be as competitive as we can as we will be competing on our own against the rest of the world. On many measures of education, skills, and productivity we already lag far behind many leading economies.
Individual school cuts for schools serving Whittington and West Felton